Multi-signal bot detection and web exploitation prevention — built for teams that need to shut down automated abuse without slowing down real users.

Transparent challenge gate — verify every session silently
Device & browser fingerprinting across 47 signal dimensions
Exploit prevention with virtual patching & anomaly scoring
One control plane for threat detection, device fingerprinting, and real-time enforcement.
ML-powered threat scoring with sub-150ms classification
Adaptive difficulty scales with real-time threat posture
Real-time analytics, audit trail & exportable reporting
A complete stack of verification, fingerprinting, and ML scoring — eliminating the need for multiple, disconnected tools.
14 mouse signals, 8 keyboard metrics, and cross-modal correlation — scored in real-time to separate humans from automation.
99.5% accurate. Uncover headless browsers, TLS spoofing, and environment tampering across 47 signal dimensions.
Detect bots, headless browsers, and coordinated attacks through layered challenge verification.
Self-learning hybrid transformer classifies sessions in <150ms. Defers to rules when confidence is low.
Real-time allow, challenge, or deny. Manage rules without code changes through the console or REST API.
WASM-bound PoW with per-session S-box transformations. Adaptive difficulty scales from 14 to 28 bits based on threat posture.
DOM escape detection, honeypot traps, polymorphic obfuscation, and canvas pixel challenges — all verifiable server-side.
Every provider makes different architectural tradeoffs. We study them all.
Behavioral sensors with Brownian-motion mouse analysis and risk scoring.
Bytecode VM fingerprinting with encrypted payloads and crypto PoW.
CDN-layer interception with device fingerprinting and edge scoring.
Obfuscated JS sensors with XOR-encrypted payloads and _abck cookies.
Invisible browser challenge combining PoW with environment probing.
Server-authoritative timing anchored with VM fingerprinting and PoW.
How It Works
Every request passes through layered verification before reaching your application. The challenge gate, exploit rules, and behavioral analysis work together — configurable through the console or the REST API, with full audit trail on every decision.
News & Resources
A structural analysis of the JS interstitial flow and TLS fingerprinting layers deployed across thousands of protected origins. We map the six-step challenge sequence, catalogue the cookie taxonomy, and examine how JA3/JA4 signatures create the strongest verification gate in the stack.
GET /target → 403 + __ddg1_ + challenge page
GET check.ddos-guard.net/check.js → IIFE + beacon nonce
POST /.well-known/ddos-guard/mark/ → fingerprint → __ddg2_Challenge parameters now adjust automatically based on per-IP threat scoring and global traffic patterns. High-risk sessions receive harder challenges without impacting legitimate users.
Six-tab admin panel with system configuration, audit logs, session management, usage invoicing, and security policy controls. Full RBAC across all console operations.
Updated JA3/JA4 signature database covering Chrome 146, Firefox 147, and Safari 17.0. Automated detection of known headless browser and HTTP library fingerprints.
Full reverse engineering analysis of the JS challenge flow, cookie taxonomy, and TLS fingerprinting layers.
Read articleHow layered verification outperforms single-signal detection in adversarial environments.
Read whitepaperHow JA3/JA4 signatures distinguish real browsers from HTTP libraries, headless Chrome, and spoofed environments.
Read articleProtect your first application, configure challenge policies, and start blocking bots in minutes.
Read guideHow computational cost enforcement changes the economics of large-scale credential stuffing attacks.
Read analysisArchitectural comparison across bot management providers — challenge designs, signal coverage, and bypass resistance.
Read comparisonWhy traditional CAPTCHAs fail against modern automation — and how server-authoritative verification changes the equation for credential stuffing and account takeover prevention.
2:00 PM EDT · VirtualThreat research team presenting on anti-bot challenge architecture patterns and the evolution of TLS fingerprinting as a verification signal.
Las Vegas, NVHands-on session covering bot defense for vibecoded apps — the most commonly exploited category of web applications in 2026.
11:00 AM EDT · VirtualPricing
One rate. Every feature. No tiers, no contracts, no minimums.
Need enterprise volume or dedicated infrastructure? Talk to us.
FAQ
Credential stuffing tools, scraping frameworks, headless browsers, automated exploit scanners, and custom bot scripts. The challenge gate verifies that every visitor is a real human on real hardware — not a request library, a headless Chrome instance, or a replay attack.
Traditional WAFs match request patterns against rule sets. AgileRisk adds a verification layer before the WAF — the challenge gate forces every session to prove it originates from a real browser with real user interaction. Bots are stopped before they ever reach your application logic.
For real browsers on real hardware, the challenge completes in 2–5 seconds on first visit. Verified sessions are remembered — returning users pass through without delay. The challenge is transparent and requires no user interaction beyond loading the page.
API routes can be protected with rate policies, anomaly scoring, and session-bound tokens. The challenge gate is designed for browser-facing surfaces, while API protection uses token validation, request pattern analysis, and per-endpoint rate limiting.
AgileRisk offers enterprise licensing with dedicated support, managed upgrades, and custom integration assistance. Contact sales@agilerisk.net for details.
Talk to our team about protecting your application from automated abuse and exploitation.